A 36-second AI clip has done what decades of campaigns could not — it has forced India to rethink the dignity of women, the ethics of elections, and the laws of technology.
September 10, 2025, 11:30 AM: The Moment a 36-Second AI Video Shook the Indian Political Landscape
On September 10, 2025, at around 11:30 AM, the Bihar Congress’s official X handle quietly dropped a 36-second AI-generated video that shook India’s political ground. The clip showed Prime Minister Narendra Modi dreaming of his late mother, Heeraben Modi, who appears to scold him for the queues caused by demonetisation, hispolitical theatrics, and using her name in Bihar campaigns.
Within hours, hashtags like #AIInsultToMother and #CongressShame began trending, BJP workers hit the streets, and by evening the first complaint had been filed at Delhi’s North Avenue Police Station. By nightfall, the controversy had escalated into FIRs, protests, and a constitutional storm over free speech, women’s dignity, and the misuse of artificial intelligence in elections.
From Posting to Protests: How One Viral Clip Escalated into FIRs and Nationwide Outrage
The timeline unfolded quickly and dramatically. First came the posting of the clip, labelled “AI GENERATED.” Then came the instant political firestorm, with BJP calling it “disgusting” and “an insult to motherhood.” The escalation was rapid: by the afternoon, Sanket Gupta, convener of BJP’s Delhi Election Cell, had already filed a formal complaint. Later that day, Delhi Police registered an FIR under sections dealing with forgery, misuse of electronic records, intentional insult, defamation, and even criminal conspiracy.
The controversy did not remain confined to social media. Streets in Ulhasnagar and Kalyan saw angry BJP workers burning effigies of Congress leaders, while the Congress party scrambled for damage control. In response, it set up a six-member fact-finding committee to examine how the video had been approved and uploaded. The digital agency that produced the clip was swiftly blacklisted pending the outcome of this inquiry. What had started as a short campaign stunt had now turned into a national crisis with legal, political, and moral dimensions.
Government’s Hard Line: Why Ministers Say This Is an Attack on Motherhood and National Dignity
The government wasted no time in seizing the moral high ground. BJP leaders declared that this was not merely a political attack on the Prime Minister but an attack on motherhood itself, an affront to every Indian family. Union ministers argued that the video violated Article 21 of the Constitution, which protects life and personal liberty, including the dignity of women. Senior leaders like Anurag Thakur and Himanta Biswa Sarma thundered that the people of Bihar would “teach Congress a lesson at the ballot box.”
Behind the scenes, government officials suggested that the incident could influence the drafting of the upcoming Digital India Act, with provisions specifically targeting AI-generated or deepfake political content. By framing the issue as one of national dignity rather than partisan rivalry, the government positioned itself to use the controversy as a stepping stone toward broader legislation.
Free Speech vs Dignity: How a Single Video Opened the Constitutional Book in India
The controversy has forced India to confront a clash at the very heart of its constitutional framework. On one hand, Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech and expression. On the other, Article 19(2) places reasonable restrictions in the interests of decency, morality, defamation, and public order. Meanwhile, Article 21 guarantees dignity as a fundamental right, extending to women and family members.
This AI video sits squarely at the crossroads of these provisions. Was it protected satire, or did it constitute defamation? Did the “AI GENERATED” disclaimer make it harmless, or was it still an intentional insult to the dignity of a deceased woman? For the first time, India’s courts and lawmakers are being pushed to confront these thorny questions in the age of artificial intelligence.
Deepfakes, Elections, and Women’s Dignity: Why This Controversy Is Bigger Than Politics
Beyond immediate politics, the controversy exposes the dark underbelly of AI misuse. Globally, 90% of deepfakes target women, often in abusive or exploitative contexts. India has already seen dozens of FIRs filed in the past year over AI-generated content used to harass women journalists and actors. This video, though political in nature, risks normalizing the misuse of technology in ways that disproportionately harm women.
The controversy also shakes the foundations of electoral ethics. India’s Model Code of Conduct prohibits personal attacks during campaigns, but it has no provisions for AI or deepfake content. Without clear guidelines, parties may continue to test boundaries, leading to a new era of digital mudslinging. If not addressed, this loophole could irreversibly damage the credibility of Indian elections.
International comparisons make India’s predicament even starker. In the United States, both President Biden and Donald Trump have been targets of deepfake videos, prompting bipartisan calls for regulation. The United Kingdom has debated banning AI political ads without disclaimers. For India, the stakes are higher because of its massive social media penetration and the deep emotional resonance of cultural values like motherhood.
From Hashtags to the Courtroom: How a 36-Second Video May Force India’s First Deepfake Law
The registration of the FIR ensures that this battle will not end on social media. It will play out in the courtroom, where judges will have to answer fundamental questions: Does labelling a video “AI GENERATED” provide any legal shield? Can satire extend to invoking family members, especially those who are deceased, without crossing into defamation? And should invoking motherhood in political campaigns be treated as a matter of national dignity requiring legal protection?
Parliament insiders already hint that the Digital India Act will address these questions head-on, with penalties for deepfake misuse in politics. If that happens, this 36-second video could be remembered as the moment that compelled India to legislate its first deepfake law.
Headlines Without Humanity? Why India Must Ask If This Political Satire Was Ever Worth It
The incident raises troubling questions for every stakeholder. For the Congress party, was the fleeting attention worth the credibility it lost by appearing disrespectful? For Indian democracy, was dragging a mother into politics worth opening up a constitutional storm? And for women everywhere, if even the Prime Minister’s mother can be digitally manipulated for political satire, what protection is left for ordinary women already facing online abuse?
This episode underscores the need to balance political expression with human dignity. Freedom of speech is strongest when exercised responsibly, not recklessly.
A Small Act That Sparked a Big Reckoning for India’s Democracy
What began as a minor campaign tactic in Bihar has erupted into a national moment of reckoning. In just 36 seconds, India was forced to grapple with the collision of freedom vs dignity, satire vs insult, and technology vs morality.
The FIR, the protests, and the government’s sharp response show that India is not prepared to let AI misuse go unchecked. When the Digital India Act is finally tabled, this incident may be remembered as the spark that pushed lawmakers to act. The message is clear: AI can assist democracy, but it cannot be allowed to trample dignity.
FOR MORE BLOGS – beyondthepunchlines.com
Author: Anjali Pandey
Add to favorites
