Tamil Nadu’s political landscape faces turbulence as the court holds Vijay’s team accountable for a man-made disaster that shook the state. 6Vijay rally stampede Madras High Court judgment 2025
October 2025: The Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed under Madras High Court supervision has begun summoning eyewitnesses and local police officials involved in the crowd control arrangements during Vijay’s Karur rally. Sources indicate that discrepancies have surfaced regarding the number of permits issued versus the actual crowd turnout.
TVK’s Response: Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) released a statement reiterating that the party had complied with all necessary permissions and blamed the local administration for inadequate ground-level coordination. However, public sentiment remains divided, with many questioning the lack of safety measures at the event.
Next Hearing: The Madras High Court is expected to review the SIT’s preliminary report in mid-October 2025, which will determine the next course of legal action and whether any further arrests are warranted.
In a significant development following the tragic stampede at actor-turned-politician Vijay’s rally in Karur, the Madras High Court has denied anticipatory bail to Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) leaders N. Anand (Bussy Anand) and C.T.R. Nirmal Kumar. The decision marks a serious setback for Vijay’s political outfit, which has been under immense public and judicial scrutiny since the September 27 tragedy that claimed 41 lives and left over a hundred injured.
The Tragedy That Shocked Tamil Nadu
The fatal incident occurred during a massive rally organized by Vijay’s newly-formed party, TVK, in Veluswamypuram, Karur district. What began as a celebratory political gathering turned into chaos when uncontrolled crowd movement caused a deadly stampede. Eyewitnesses reported a lack of proper crowd management and emergency response, leading to widespread panic.
Court Observations: ‘A Man-Made Disaster’
Justice of the Madras High Court, while rejecting the bail plea, observed that the tragedy was not a mere accident but a ‘man-made disaster’, resulting from negligence and poor planning by TVK organizers. The court expressed deep concern over the lack of remorse shown by the party and its leaders in the aftermath of the tragedy.
“The conduct of the organizers after the incident reflects irresponsibility and disregard for human life,” the bench noted, adding that investigations were still in their preliminary stage, and granting bail could hamper the process.
Legal Action and SIT Formation
Following the tragedy, the Tamil Nadu Police registered an FIR against multiple TVK functionaries under sections relating to culpable homicide, negligence, and violation of public safety protocols. The High Court further directed the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the case comprehensively, ensuring no political influence affects the inquiry.
The SIT has been tasked with investigating not just the stampede but also two hit-and-run incidents allegedly involving TVK’s campaign vehicles that were initially ignored. The court emphasized the need for transparent accountability from both political leaders and law enforcement authorities.
Vijay and TVK Under Fire
The ruling also drew attention to Vijay Rally Tragedy’s own role in the events leading up to and following the tragedy. The High Court questioned why the actor-politician allegedly left the scene instead of assisting victims or coordinating relief measures. The bench remarked that such conduct “reflects the mental state of political leaders in handling public responsibility.”
This observation has intensified criticism against Vijay, with opposition leaders accusing him of prioritizing political optics over humanitarian response.
Ban on Rallies Until SOPs Are Established
In a broader directive, the Madras High Court has temporarily banned all political rallies and roadshows on national and state highways across Tamil Nadu. The court instructed the state government to formulate Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for future public gatherings to prevent such tragedies.
Until the SOPs are approved, all parties — including TVK — have been advised to restrict mass gatherings and adopt virtual or localized outreach methods.
What Lies Ahead for TVK
With the denial of anticipatory bail, Bussy Anand and Nirmal Kumar face imminent arrest, signaling a tough legal road ahead for TVK’s leadership. The political fallout could also affect Vijay’s plans to expand his party’s grassroots presence ahead of the next state elections.
Legal experts suggest that unless TVK demonstrates proactive corrective measures and cooperation with authorities, the court may continue to take a stringent stance. The case also raises broader questions about accountability in celebrity-led politics and the ethics of mobilizing massive crowds without adequate safety frameworks.
Political Reactions: Opposition parties including the DMK and AIADMK have called for a broader probe into the political accountability of celebrity-led events. They have demanded clear SOPs to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
Vijay rally stampede Madras High Court judgment 2025: Conclusion
The Madras High Court’s order stands as a stern reminder that political ambition cannot come at the cost of public safety. As investigations continue, the tragedy at Karur remains a sobering lesson for all parties in Tamil Nadu — that in the race for power, human lives must never become collateral damage.
FOR MORE BLOGS – beyondthepunchlines.com
Author: Team BTP
Add to favorites
