Behind India’s poverty during colonial times was a simple fact—the wealth of the nation was drained to make another wealthy.
India was among the world’s wealthiest nations in the early 1700s. It contributed almost 24% of global GDP while Britain contributed less than 3%. Indian handicrafts, spices, and textiles were of international fame, and Dhaka, Surat, and Murshidabad were decent centers of trade.
But this wealth stood on weak ground. After the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, the Mughal Empire collapsed. India broke into small kingdoms that often fought each other. Foreign invasions, like Nadir Shah’s attack on Delhi in 1739, which carried away the Koh-i-Noor diamond, and Ahmad Shah Abdali’s repeated raids, further weakened the country. Heavy taxes, corruption, and social divisions also hurt unity.
This made it a smooth ride for the British East India Company, which first came over as merchants in 1600, to gradually take over power.
How a Trading Company Became a Ruling Power
The British did not overtake India overnight. They exploited India’s weaknesses step by step. Mughal decline left no good central power. The Battle of Plassey (1757) and the Battle of Buxar (1764) brought Bengal, the richest province of India, which accounted for almost 40% of India’s GDP in that period, under British control. The British employed manipulation of the rivalries between the rulers in order to make friends into enemies, e.g., when Mir Jafar became an enemy of Siraj-ud-Daulah at Plassey.
Political acumen also helped their cause. The Subsidiary Alliance forced Indian princes to pay for British troops who were present in their territory, and the Doctrine of Lapse allowed the annexation of states without heirs. A second reason was Indian cooperation. Several zamindars, moneylenders, and even soldiers were pro-British. In the 1850s, more than 80% of the Company’s army consisted of Indian sepoys.
After the failed Revolt of 1857, the British Crown took direct control, starting the Raj, where exploitation became official policy.
Naoroji’s Big Discovery: The Economic Drain Theory
Dadabhai Naoroji, known as the “Grand Old Man of India,” was the first to expose the British plunder in detail. In his book “Poverty and Un-British Rule in India” (1901), he explained how wealth left India without any return. He put the annual drain at around ₹30–40 crore during the late 19th century. Contemporary analysis by economist Utsa Patnaik (2018) reveals that the overall drain from 1765 to 1938 was nearly $45 trillion in current values. Naoroji quipped said “India is like a milk cow being sucked dry.”
How the Drain Worked in Practice
The drain manifested itself in various ways. British officers’ salaries, pensions, and administrative expenses were levied on Indian revenues but utilized in Britain. By 1901, this amounted to almost £20 million annually. British and military officials repatriated their pay, which implied that money made in India never remained here.
Trade operated against India as well. India exported raw materials such as cotton, indigo, opium, and jute, and imported British factory products in return. Between 1860, India’s export of cloth decreased by 70%, and British cloth imports skyrocketed. Wars and railway loans were raised in London but paid back by Indian taxpayers at high interest. Even the railway, boasted as modernization, mostly benefited British profit. By the 1880s, 80% of railway freight consisted of raw material exports and had 5% guaranteed returns for British investors, financed by Indians.
The Human Cost: How the Drain Crushed India
The effect of this drain was catastrophic. Indigenous industries were ruined. Metropolitan towns such as Dhaka, which were known earlier for muslin production, became impoverished as craftsmen lost their means of livelihood. India had more than 30 such big famines during British rule. The 1770 Bengal Famine caused the death of 10 million individuals, and the 1876–78 Great Famine caused the death of 5–6 million people, as food was exported to other nations.
Agrarians were taxed with extortionate land revenue rates—usually 50% of crops, much more than under the Mughals. They were compelled to cultivate cash crops such as indigo and cotton rather than grains, further worsening hunger. The average Indian’s life expectancy was only 32 years, literacy level was only 12%, and per capita income had remained stuck at ₹230 a year for almost two centuries when India gained independence in 1947. India’s share in world GDP fell from 24% in 1700 to a mere 3% in 1947.
From Drain to Resistance: How Indians Fought Back
Naoroji’s Drain Theory gave Indian nationalism a clear economic foundation. The early Indian National Congress raised demands for reducing “Home Charges” and allowing more Indians into services. Thinkers like R.C. Dutt and M.G. Ranade showed how British policies created famine and poverty. Gandhi took this further, turning economics into a mass movement. His call for Swadeshi and spinning khadi directly challenged the drain of wealth.
By the 1940s and the 1920s, economic criticism united peasants, workers, and the middle class. “Quit India” was more than a demand for political independence—it was a demand to put an end to economic exploitation.
The British “Benefits” Exposed as a Myth
The British claimed to modernize India by providing railways, law, and English education. But these “gifts” were meant for their gain. Railways largely transported raw materials for export only. In 1901, literacy was only 5.35%, indicating that education hardly reached common people. Courts and legislation guarded landlords and traders associated with the British, not common Indians.
What the British referred to as development was actually an instrument of extraction.
The Legacy of Exploitation: Poverty and Reparations
India was among the poorest nations on the globe at the time of independence in 1947. Agriculture was in stagnation, industries were small, literacy was only 12%, and life expectancy was 32 years. Even now, the impact of this drain is controversial. In 2015, Shashi Tharoor’s Oxford Union speech rekindled the demand for colonial reparations, reminding the world of how Britain had ascended at India’s expense.
Freedom is Meaningless Without Economic Power
The Economic Drain Theory showed that India’s poverty was not inherent but artificially caused by policies of exploitation. Britain’s industrial revolution was founded on India’s plundered riches. For nearly two centuries, a nation that had dominated the world economy was brought low by famine and poverty.
The lesson is clear: political liberty without economic power is a half-measure. As India emerges on the world stage again, this lesson serves as a reminder that a nation must defend its resources and industries to be trulyfree.
FOR MORE BLOGS – beyondthepunchlines.com
Author: Anjali Pandey
Add to favorites
